Jeff or Hyde impressed me most. As he said in the book, "I am one person of two sides." That's it. He's quite different from Lanyon and Utterson, and even differs from many characters in other.

　　I love to read this character though I don't like this evil man at all. But I really take a great pity on this bad guy.

　　On one hand, he gained much joy from the successful experiment. What's more, on the other hand, he can escape from punishment while doing bad as Hyde. So, we may guess why Stevenson names the bad guy Hyde, which sounds like "hide". I have to say that he is quite a success and very achievable, while just as a doctor or Jeff, not Hyde at all.

　　However, more bitterness than sweets had he tastes. Each time he recovered to Jeff after doing bad, what a huge guilty he must burden. I still remember in his letter to Utterson, described was a poor man near to break down with much guilty and regrets beyond our thoughts and almost a lunatic.

　　As a real human with emotions and affections, he is absolutely quite a failure despite of his achievements on science. Represented on the paper is a man full of evil! And I hope this tragedy on science never come true, for it will destroy all we have.

本文来自：逍遥右脑记忆 /duhougan/1019169.html

相关阅读：巴黎圣母院读后感1000字范文
红与黑读后感1000字
《一地梨花》读后感1000字
哈姆雷特读后感1000字
朝花夕拾读书笔记1000字